Following The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Atlantic, the online encyclopedia now has daily activities ...

You’d spin up a site—broad or niche—and throw the doors open for anyone to edit. Be an early mover (like Wikipedia) or cultivate a loyal community (think any popular sci-fi or fantasy show), and ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

If you've ever gone to look up a quick fact and just kept browsing from one article (or page, or video), to another, to ...

On the world’s free, collaboratively edited encyclopedia, even the co-founder is powerless to change his entry, for vanity ...

An analysis found that about 40% of over 1,000 randomly selected Wikipedia articles contain outdated or incorrect information ...

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.” Sanger told UnHerd ...

Per Wikipedia policy, articles can’t slander or skew the lives of living people, and must draw their facts from “reliable sources.” Advertisement But soft asks like this are cheap, of course ...

English Wikipedia raked in more than 84 billion views this year, according to numbers released Tuesday by the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit behind the free, publicly edited online encyclopedia.

“Only 17 percent of biographies on Wikipedia are about women. Help us change that!” read the event description on meetup.com. Answering the clarion call, a group of strangers gathered inside ...

On Wikipedia, gender inequality is hiding in plain sight. Of more than a million and a half biographies - that's on the English-language version - fewer than 19% are about women.